Mukasey Mukasey Mukasey….. The Attorney General Michael Mukasey once again tap-danced around the issue if waterboarding was illegal and technically torture as he was grilled on the subject in front of the Senate yesterday.  I know this is lame, but I’m going to quote myself from a post I did on this subject in October when this human waste of skin was going through the nomination/confirmation process.  I said:

 I have an idea, let’s line up Bushy-poo, Cheney, Rice, Mr. Mukasey and all of the other neo-con war-birds who are for these methods and have them undergo “alternative” questioning.  After they are interrogated, we’ll poll them to see if they felt they were tortured.

As a coincidence, the Senate Democrats asked a question of Mukasey during the hearing and received this answer (Click here for full ABCnews.com article):

“Would waterboarding be torture if it was done to you?”

“I would feel that it was,” Mukasey answered.

It all really boils down to this, if Mukasey declares officially that waterboarding is torture and illegal, the CIA will be liable for litigation for performing this in the past, this is a cover up and CYA move by the assholes in charge of this country.  The problem is there is a loose definition of what torture is, it mostly includes what you can’t do (maim, rape, burn, etc. etc.).  An exclusionary list of things will never work effectively as the CIA or other clandestine organizations will always be able to come up with creative ideas of torture that aren’t technically torture by the legal definitions.

I have another idea, let’s strap Mukasey down to a board, I will have prepared for a month by working out and sitting in a sauna daily, AND will not shower for the month.  I will then dip my balls on his face (classic T-bag maneuver), he can then tell me if that is torture or not as it technically isn’t prohibited.

Share This

Who does Bush and his cronies think he is fooling?  The Bush administration is desperate to salvage a legacy and take the focus off of the epic failures in foreign policy, domestic policy, and the failures in Iraq (let alone the incredible damage to the economy).  Bushy-poo the benevolent, will now bring peace to the Palestinians and Israelis, he will finally bring peace where many many others have failed.  Does the plan to have a Palestinian-Israeli peace accord by the end of 2008 seem a bit to convenient to you?  I’m actually insulted that this administration thinks so little of the American people.  Click here for a CNN.com propaganda article regarding the peace process.

Share This

Dr. Jan Adams, douchebag, tool… douche-tool.  Why would you go on national live television to say you will not talk about an event publicly (and thus surprising the host Larry King)?  The answer, because you’re a fucking ass-wad.  He could have written a letter, sent an email, used semaphore, had a private conversation, basically, he could have communicated to Larry King his position in a myriad of ways but he chose to put himself on TV.  This asshole probably thinks he’s doing the noble thing and will look good respecting the wishes of the West family, sure, but do it off the air.  The real answer, because YOU WANTED TO BE ON TV, attention whore.

Share This

Former Atlantic City Mayor Robert Levy has plead guilty to bilking the Veteran’s Affairs department of nearly $25K.  More from a story posted on CNN.com:

The 60-year-old Democrat claimed he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Parachutists Badge and successfully completed the Airborne School with more than 100 jumps.

He claimed that he had twice been abandoned in the jungle by his troops for several weeks, which he cited as the basis for suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.

It turns out that Levy claimed he was in the Green Berets in Vietnam when he was actually enlisted only.  I guess he was dreaming big after watching First Blood and Rambo First Blood Part II, hell I pretended to be a Ninja after all of the ’80’s Ninja movies, but then again, I wasn’t elected mayor of AC.

What is really surprising (so far) is that this is the only corruption reported on this clown.

Share This

Retired judge and US Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey has refused to answer the question of whether the interrogation technique known as waterboarding violates US law.  For those of you who don’t know, waterboarding is the interrogation technique where the suspect is strapped to a board and either immersed in water or water is poured on them to simulate drowning.  Congress declared waterboarding illegal in 2006.  So what I want to know is how the fuck can Mukasey NOT say this is against US law?  Oh yeah, because our jit-bag government uses it and other “alternative” interrogation techniques as reported in this CNN.com article:

Bush has acknowledged authorizing the use of “alternative” interrogation techniques against suspected terrorists.

Though his administration insists that it does not torture prisoners, it refuses to reveal which interrogation techniques may be used.

I have an idea, let’s line up Bushy-poo, Cheney, Rice, Mr. Mukasey and all of the other neo-con war-birds who are for these methods and have them undergo “alternative” questioning.  After they are interrogated, we’ll poll them to see if they felt they were tortured.  I would have a hell of lot more respect for them if they just said “hell yes we torture them” than tap dancing around and lying.

 I will leave you with a good quote about torture from Reservoir Dogs, Nice Guy Eddie:

Would you stop it with that shit.  You beat on this prick enough, he’ll tell ya he started the Chicago fire.  That don’t necessarily make it so.

Share This

In a CNN.com article entitled “Iran becoming new Iraq on campaign trail”Obama was quoted as saying:

The senator from Illinois added that unfortunately, the Kyl-Lieberman amendment made the case for President Bush that we need to use our military presence in Iraq to counter Iran — a case that has nothing to do with sanctioning the Revolutionary Guard.”

The Kyl-Lieberman amendment passed 76-22 in the Senate last month. It calls, in part, for the Revolutionary Guard to be designated a terrorist organization. While Obama opposes the legislation, he was campaigning when the full Senate took up the bill and missed the vote.

So let me get this straight Obama, this amendment which you oppose, brings us closer to action against Iran (essentially labeling it as a terrorist state) and makes a case for long-term military presence in Iraq to counter the Iranian “threat”.  This seems like an important amendment, and yet you were too fucking busy campaigning to vote against it even though you oppose it.  Obama is the same asshole who goes after the voting records of his opponents on the campaign trail while he has the luxury of not having a voting record.  Obama = tool.

Share This

As I discussed a couple of days ago in my post “Iran as a threat… et tu Blair”the current administration and the military industrial complex (MIC) is ramping up its pre-war rhetoric which has an end-game of aggressive action against Iran.  Cheney has been the latest to deliver the solemn news and a firm warning to Iran as reported by CNN.com:

“Our country, and the entire international community, cannot stand by as a terror-supporting state fulfills its grandest ambitions,” Cheney said in a speech to the Washington Institute for Near East Studies.

He said Iran’s efforts to pursue technology that would allow them to build a nuclear weapon are obvious and that “the regime continues to practice delay and deceit in an obvious effort to buy time.”

If Iran continues on its current course, Cheney said the U.S. and other nations are “prepared to impose serious consequences.” The vice president made no specific reference to military action.

“We will not allow Iran to have a nuclear weapon,” he said.

Cheney’s words seemed to only escalate the U.S. rhetoric against Iran over the past several days, including President Bush’s warning that a nuclear Iran could lead to World War III.

Please take a moment to let those strong words from Cheney and Bush sink in.  Is this the legacy that Bush is looking for in his lame duck years to capstone his Presidency?  World War III?  I can’t imagine why else they (the Bush administration) are pushing this agenda.  The Bush administration must really have no respect for the collective intelligence of the American people if they feel they can continue to deceive and manipulate information toward a goal of further war.  They must be completely convinced the American people are idiots and won’t recognize the pattern.  This is pathetic and it makes me sick to my stomach.

Share This

A Connecticut substitute teacher was fired for airing The Simpson’s Movie to his classes.  The catch is, his classes were 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders.  I’m all for free speech, but this was a dumb-ass move.  I’m opposed to the movie ratings system philosophically, but practically as a parent, I can see me using it as a quick gauge for whether the material is appropriate for my kids.  The Simpson’s Movie is rated PG-13 and I can’t see one thing educational, apart from an animation or film course (which wouldn’t be in the curriculum of elementary schools), that would necessitate airing this to 3rd graders.  A local news station in Boston had the story:

School officials said they had warned 30-year-old Aquil Abdul-Salaam that the PG-13 rated film isn’t appropriate for children.

Officials said Abdul-Salaam admitted showing the movie to students at Beecher School between mid-September and Oct. 4. Beecher School is for children in grades kindergarten through seventh grade.

Sadcox has been commenting on the sad state of our public education for some time, and unfortunately this is just another sad example of how low our education standards are in this country.  Thank you Mr. Connecticut fucktard for perpetuating our poor education standards.

Share This

We’ve seen this before with Iraq, it is a pattern (an algorithm if you will), it starts with “intelligence” about how somebody somewhere else is to blame for something (or our problems) and it ends with the US attacking that somebody.  In the Iraq example, it started with the “intelligence” regarding WMD’s, it turned into Iraq is a terrorist sympathizer, and finally into Iraq is a terrorist state and is somehow responsible for 9/11.  If that past (and very much present) mistake wasn’t enough, now we’re worrying about Iran?  You’ve got to be shitting me.  The military industrial complex and its “think tanks” are ramping up for another aggressive mistakewar.  And as a part of this pre-war propaganda and media hype, Blair has decided to reaffirm he is a solid “Bush-man” and make his opinion on the subject known.  Below are a few blurbs from a BBC news story:

But on a more serious note he spoke of what he called an extremist Islamic ideology.

“This ideology now has a state - Iran - that is prepared to back and finance terror in the pursuit of destabilising countries whose people wish to live in peace.”

“There is a tendency even now, even in some of our own circles, to believe that they are as they are because we have provoked them and if we left them alone they would leave us alone.

“I fear this is mistaken. They have no intention of leaving us alone.”

They have no intention of leaving us alone?  Hold the phone pal, what exactly have they done to the US, or the UK for that matter?  Since 1979, they’ve pretty much kept out of Western  affairs.  AND, if they are involved in Iraq now, it is exactly because we have provoked them.  I’m not defending Iran, I think we should just get the hell out of the region and let them sort it out for themselves.  Look at Vietnam, we are trading with them again, hell they are the new India in terms of high-tech off-shoring.  Blair, please do us a favor and shut the fuck up, when do you start working for Halliburton anyway?

Share This

The mainstream media (ABCnews in this case) is starting to report the same sentiments from my original post about Ann Coulter.  In this particular article on ABCnews entitled Ann Coulter: Marketing Genius?, they had the following things to say:

“I think [her comments] are highly calculated,” said Liam O’Brien, an expert in media criticism and pop culture at Quinnipiac University. “I’m not sure she knows what trigger on which verbal gun she is going to pull at any given moment, but I think at any particular time, she has three or four of these things that are controversial and inflammatory enough to get national press notice above and beyond whatever the topic is of her book or the talk show.”

Coincidence or not, a few of Coulter’s book releases have, in fact, coincided with a remark that has ignited a media frenzy.

Big surprise, unfortunately, her base of extreme right wing morons and village idiots will still buy her books.  Let’s hope the Coulter haters wake up and stop giving her the attention and stop buying her books.  People need to start expressing their opinions with their wallets.

Share This