Jan 31 2008

Torture? What Torture redux

Some more stuff by billymac at 8:13 am under BS, ethics, politics

Mukasey Mukasey Mukasey….. The Attorney General Michael Mukasey once again tap-danced around the issue if waterboarding was illegal and technically torture as he was grilled on the subject in front of the Senate yesterday.  I know this is lame, but I’m going to quote myself from a post I did on this subject in October when this human waste of skin was going through the nomination/confirmation process.  I said:

 I have an idea, let’s line up Bushy-poo, Cheney, Rice, Mr. Mukasey and all of the other neo-con war-birds who are for these methods and have them undergo “alternative” questioning.  After they are interrogated, we’ll poll them to see if they felt they were tortured.

As a coincidence, the Senate Democrats asked a question of Mukasey during the hearing and received this answer (Click here for full ABCnews.com article):

“Would waterboarding be torture if it was done to you?”

“I would feel that it was,” Mukasey answered.

It all really boils down to this, if Mukasey declares officially that waterboarding is torture and illegal, the CIA will be liable for litigation for performing this in the past, this is a cover up and CYA move by the assholes in charge of this country.  The problem is there is a loose definition of what torture is, it mostly includes what you can’t do (maim, rape, burn, etc. etc.).  An exclusionary list of things will never work effectively as the CIA or other clandestine organizations will always be able to come up with creative ideas of torture that aren’t technically torture by the legal definitions.

I have another idea, let’s strap Mukasey down to a board, I will have prepared for a month by working out and sitting in a sauna daily, AND will not shower for the month.  I will then dip my balls on his face (classic T-bag maneuver), he can then tell me if that is torture or not as it technically isn’t prohibited.

Mukasey Balls

5 Responses to “Torture? What Torture redux”

  1. Mikeon 31 Jan 2008 at 8:57 am

    Dood.

    Good thing I wasn’t eating lunch.

    How about this? After the teabagging is done, scrap the greasy ball buildup off of your balls and spread it on some toast.

    Or make a “ball butter” sandwich and give him a tasty snack.

  2. Mimzieon 31 Jan 2008 at 9:06 am

    Ball butter sandwich? I’m skipping lunch today, for sure!

  3. Hungry Motheron 31 Jan 2008 at 10:33 am

    Scrotum-boarding just might be torture.

  4. Ted Velveton 31 Jan 2008 at 1:44 pm

    if the dems had balls in the first place none of this shit would ever have gone on. They should have started impeachment procedings against Bush and Cheney the 2nd they took back the house.

  5. billymacon 02 Feb 2008 at 2:41 pm

    mike: it sounds like you’ve put some thought into “ball butter”… i bet there are some sick fucks that would buy it too. we should talk business plan

    mimz: you can invest in our “ball butter” enterprise… it sounds like you can recognize a winner too.

    HM: yep, but it would fun to do it to mukasey and bush and cheney, and rice….

    TV: yeah, but no balls, plan, or backbone has relegated them to bitch status…

Trackback URI |


Comments links could be nofollow free.

Close
E-mail It